We make consequential judgment visible and testable under pressure.
PAVNESS is the company you engage. Workshops are the service. Pressure Room is the proprietary living-company simulation product inside the work.
Or start free: the Workslop Tax Self-Diagnostic (3 min) Or Book a 15-minute scope call
In practice a standard means four things: what AI may do here, who owns the call, what reasoning must remain visible, and when escalation is warranted.
Every organization runs on judgment that nobody wrote down — the trade-offs, the exceptions, the thresholds that live in the heads of the people who have been there long enough to have them. That arrangement works, quietly, for years. It stops working the moment the decision system changes.
Two things change it. A machine joins it, and work starts arriving polished, confident and unexamined. Or the person who carried the judgment leaves, and the calls they used to make are now being made by somebody reasoning from scratch.
In both cases the failure looks identical from the outside: a decision that nobody can explain afterward, and no clear answer to who made it.
What we actually sell
PAVNESS sells facilitated decision and judgment workshops for two primary buyers: founders and CEOs who need the company to rely less on their constant presence, and corporate executive teams who need to expose hidden divergence before it becomes expensive.
Pressure Room powers those workshops. Leaders make consequential calls inside a living fictional company, experience what those choices create, and turn the pattern into explicit rules for ownership, evidence, escalation and AI authority.
The public formats run at three depths: fifty minutes to understand the mechanism, two hours to make divergence observable, and a half day to make expectations shared across a department. Every format uses constructed simulations, so nothing of yours has to leave the room.
Before that, and free: the Workslop Tax Self-Diagnostic puts the AI rework cost on your own headcount at your own hourly rate, and asks what your signature currently sits on.
What makes it work
No single element is the differentiator. The combination is.
- a policy describing how AI ought to be used
- attention on the model and its outputs
- a document that is read once and filed
- Decision science creates the conditions and reveals how judgment actually moves
- THINK gives each person a routine to run before they sign
- A standard — what AI may do here, who owns the call, what reasoning stays visible, when to escalate
- Simulation tests whether people can hold it under pressure, not whether they agree they should
- Application translates it to their own work without us ingesting anything proprietary
What it costs, and why the number is on the page
USD 5,000 for the first three 50-minute sessions booked before 31 October 2026, and USD 7,500 after that. USD 12,000 for two hours. USD 17,000 for the half day.
Nobody in this category publishes a price. Publishing ours means every buyer sees the same number, there is nothing to negotiate, and you can tell in about four seconds whether this is a conversation worth having. The founding rate is a date, not a discount, and it closes on 31 October whether or not the calendar is full.
What we don’t do
We don’t need your systems. No systems integration is required. No access to your production AI, systems or proprietary company data is required for the standard Pressure Room experience.
We don’t certify anything. We do not review, approve or validate any AI system, model or vendor, and we issue no finding that a system is fit for a given purpose. Whether a specific organization is covered by any rule, and what that rule requires, is a determination for its counsel.
We don’t sell the remedy. There is no software to license, no seats to renew and no implementation to buy afterward. If a conversation after the session leads somewhere further, it is scoped and priced separately, and said out loud rather than built into the original pitch.
We don’t assess people. Nothing said in the room is reported back to the organization as a judgment about a named individual. The work describes how decisions are being made, on the day it is run, in the scenarios it tests. Finding that a decision cannot currently be defended is a useful result, not a failure.
AI can make the call. It can't take the fall.
Tell us where AI has entered a decision that matters.
Useful if you have them: the function, roughly how many people review AI-assisted work, and what prompted the question. None of it is required.
This goes straight to pav@pavness.com and you'll receive a response within 48 hours. Prefer the calendar? Book a 15-minute scope call directly.